Legal Opinion
Lopoczyk v. Chester A. Poling, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 7, 1945No. 93PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, a mate on defendant’s tanker “Poling No. 18,” sued by way of civil action in the District Court to recover under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, for personal injuries received in the course of his employment. The accident occurred about noon on March 12, 1942, while the tanker was moored to the dock of the Royal Petroleum Company for the discharge of oil from its tanks to pipe lines on the dock. The “Poling No. 18” is a self-propelled, five-tank vessel with a hollow steel mast stepped into the deck between the first and second tanks. Its equipment for the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Pekelis v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Curtis Taylor v. The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Andrew Terrasi v. South Atlantic Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Naylor v. Isthmian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.