Legal Opinion

State v. Rudd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 18, 1983No. 8218SC588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant has brought forward twelve assignments of error, but we deem appropriate to deal with only one.

In his third assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to make a record of the proceedings and by threatening to incarcerate defendant’s counsel for requesting the trial court to do so. In support of this argument, defendant refers to both the trial transcripts and to an affidavit of defendant’s counsel, attached to and incorporated into defendant’s motion for appropriate relief, included in the record on appeal. The trial transcript shows…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API