Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re Marriage of Pace

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 8, 1996No. 1 — 93 — 3134Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE WOLFSON,

specially concurring:

I agree with the result reached by the majority because I believe the trial judge actually used the analytical approach in determining whether the personal injury settlement was marital property. I write this specially concurring opinion because the majority leaves Cook County trial judges in doubt as to which approach to take. My own preference is the analytical approach of In re Marriage of Waggoner, 261 Ill. App. 3d 787, 634 N.E.2d 1198 (1994).

Waggoner departs from previous Illinois decisions on whether personal injury and worker's compensation claims…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of GanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Parks v. McWhorterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API