Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Forth Worth v. Johnson

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided April 30, 2003No. 10-00-359-CVPublished

1DissentBill Vance, Justice

Agreeing with the majority in part, my dissent focuses on the holding that the evidence is factually insufficient to support the trial judge’s findings that a causal connection existed between Johnson’s reports of violations of law and the City’s decision to terminate his employment.

CITY’S CONCESSION AT ORAL ARGUMENT

We heard oral argument on January 18, 2002. On February 1, Johnson filed a post-submission letter-brief, which states:

During the City’s rebuttal argument on January 18, 2002 before the Court, the attorney for the City of Fort Worth *170conceded that this is probably not a causal link…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API