Hull v. Barth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Joseph T. Hull and others, composing the firm of Bafferty & Co., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant John 0. Barth, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of Hew York on the 15th day of June, 1898, upon the dismissal of the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ case by direction of the court after a trial at the Hew York Trial Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Brunt, P. J.:
This action was brought to recover against the defendants as copartners for goods furnished for use at the Ocean Hotel at Long Branch, H. J. On the 24tli of February, 1897, the defendant Barth leased to his co-defendant, John Spitler, certain premises at Long Branch, in the State of Hew Jersey, known as the Ocean Hotel property, for the summer season of 1897. By said- lease, Spitler agreed to open the hotel for business not later than the 27th of June, 1897, and to keep the same open at least until the 1st of Sep-' tenober, 1897, and not later than the 15th of October, 1897.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cassidy v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Manhattan Brass & Manufacturing Co. v. SearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Hackett v. . StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hull v. BarthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Johnson v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Johnson v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Hawkins v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Wolf v. LawrenceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900