Wilson v. Mayor of Collingswood
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 51 Vroom 62G.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
Without expressing an opinion upon the matters dealt with by the Supreme Court, we think it advisable to deal with the question expressly reserved, -whether the plans of the proposed water works should have been submitted to the state board of health and state water-supply commission before they were voted upon.
The object of the legislation in requiring an issue of bonds and a proposal for the construction of water works in boroughs to be submitted to the voters for their approval must have been to secure intelligent action by those who would…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Biddle v. Mayor of RivertonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
- State v. Mayor of Spring LakeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schinck v. BD. OF ED. OF WESTWOOD CONSOL. SCHOOL DIST.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Borough of Collingswood v. State Water Supply CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Walker v. Township of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Brodhead v. Mayor of FlemingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913