Legal Opinion
Lerma v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 25, 1988No. C-87-20522-WAIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
INGRAM, Chief Judge.
The motion of defendant United States to dismiss this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-2680, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), came on regularly for hearing on December 7, 1987. Following the hearing, the plaintiffs filed a supplemental memorandum on December 17th, with the permission of the court, in order to respond to arguments raised in the defendant’s reply brief.
Upon consideration of all the papers submitted and the argument of counsel, the motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carolyn L. Ducey v. United States of America, Lois M. Olson v. United States of America, Helen Grugel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Edward C. Becker, Administrator of the Estate of Ernest J. Becker, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Opal v. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alyce Couch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Kwitek v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Jimenez v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2001