Legal Opinion

Dantzic v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 30, 1971No. 113PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

We granted certiora/ri “for the sole purpose of determining whether or not the Court of Appeals has authority to issue writ of error coram nobis."

In State v. Green, discussed below, this specific question was not presented to or considered by the Court of Appeals or by this Court. A brief resume of the factual situation and of the decisions in Green is appropriate.

In State v. Green, 8 N.C. App. 234, 174 S.E. 2d 8 (1970), the appeal to the Court of Appeals was from Judge Godwin’s denial of the petition for a writ of error coram nobis filed by Green in the Superior Court…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hysler v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Taylor v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Dantzic v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. In the Matter of CrutchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. In the Matter of CrutchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API