Legal Opinion · Dissent

James v. Union Graded School Dist. No. 2

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 24, 1949No. 33313Published

1DissentO’Neal, J.

I cannot concur in the majority opinion herein, and because of the far-reaching effect thereof with reference to the title of property belonging to many common school districts in the state which have been included in union graded school districts, I feel that I should set forth the reasons for my dissent.

I think the opinion is erroneous in more than one respect. First, Union Graded School District No. 2, Muskogee county, never did and never could and never can acquire title to the two acres of land here involved or the buildings located thereon.

The record shows, and it is conceded, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. School Board of Consolidated District No. 36 v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Newcomer v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API