In re Mississippi River Power Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
In the matter of appeal from assessment of the property of the Mississippi River Power Company. On motion to remand to state court.
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, District Judge.
S. H. Johnston, claiming to be the assessor of a certain taxing district within the city of Keokuk, Iowa, listed and assessed the property of the Mississippi River Power Company at the sum of $8,000,000, and, claiming to act.pursuant to the law of Iowa, he assessed a penalty of 100 per cent, for alleged refusal *195of the company to sign or swear to the assessment roll, thus making a total valuation for assessment purposes of $16,000,000. This assessment being returned to the board of review of the city of Keokuk, the power company filed objections thereto, and a hearing was…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1925
- Iowa Loan & Trust Co. v. FairweatherDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1918
- Murphy v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1931
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Drainage Dist. No. 8 of Shelby CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1916
- Chunes v. Duluth, W. & P. RY. CO.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.