Legal Opinion

In Re Leuschen

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1933No. Docket No. 254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was charged, in a complaint filed in the Justice’s Court of Fullerton, Orange County, with violating section 476a of the Penal Code by issuing and passing six certain checks with the knowledge that he did not have sufficient funds in nor credit with the banks upon which they were drawn to meet the same in full. After a preliminary hearing a commitment was issued holding him to answer.

This petition is based upon the contention that no reasonable or probable cause was shown, since the evidence is entirely insufficient to show…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. RouthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. In Re ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Cuevas CollazoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
  2. People v. Cuevas CollazoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API