Legal Opinion

Zauk v. Attaway

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1918No. 8976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, Bryan County; J. L. Rappolee, Judge. Action by H. W. Attaway against B. II. Zauk. Judgment for plaintiff, motion, for . new trial overruled, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter styled “plaintiff,” brought an action against the defendant in error, hereinafter styled “defendant,” to recover upon a verified account in the sum of $660.40.

The evidence in the case covers 300 typewritten pages, and it would, without corresponding benefit, unreasonably incumber the opinion to set out even an abridgment thereof.

The material evidence is that in the year 1913 the plaintiff was erecting three brick buildings in the tolwn of Bennington, Okla., and the defendant was erecting one building adjoining said other buildings; that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dick v. EssarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SimmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Wolfe v. Bass Furn. & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API