Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Singletary
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 24, 1996No. 95-3119PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
672 So.2d 602 (1996)
Matthew DIXON, Petitioner,
v.
Harry SINGLETARY, Respondent.
No. 95-3119.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 24, 1996.
Matthew Dixon, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
Matthew Dixon, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, petitions the court for a writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, following our affirmance of petitioner's multiple criminal convictions and sentences.…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Cleveland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Whatley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Dixon v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Lago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007