Legal Opinion

Gulliford v. McQuillen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1907No. 14,834PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Chase district court; Frederick A. Meckel, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

Gulliford became, the owner of a mill, and not being himself a miller employed McQuillen to operate it. Not long thereafter the two had a conversation or conversations in regard to selling or trading the mill, in which, according to McQuillen’s testimony, Gulliford agreed to pay him a commission of two per cent, if he could dispose of the mill for $18,000. Gulliford testified that McQuillen asked a commission but he expressly refused to pay it. An exchange was finally effected, with one McClintock, of the mill and $2000 for a drugstore and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Estate of Marcotte v. ClaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Chalvet v. HustonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API