Legal Opinion

Ruhl-Koblegard Co. v. Gillespie

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1907PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Webster County. Bill of the Ruhl-Koblegard Company against J. M. Gillispie and others. Decree for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, President:

The Ruhl-Koblegard Company complains of a decree of the circuit court of Webster county dismissing its bill filed for the purpose of setting aside two alleged fraudulent conveyances of lots of land situate in the town of Addison, to Maggie E, Gillespie, the wife of James M. Gillespie, and seeking to subject the same to the payment of a debt claimed to be due to it from the last named defendant. The record of the cause discloses that by two certain deeds dated the 18th day of August, 1894, and the 16th day of October, 1897, re*585spectively, for certain considerations therein…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glenny v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Trimble v. WoodheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Moyer v. DeweySupreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gochenour v. George & Francis Ball FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1941
  2. Rowe v. Bonneau-Jeter Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Matney v. CombsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Neuberger v. FelisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Baldwin v. KingstonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API