Hiriart v. Ballon
Supreme Court of the United States
IN error to the. district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, (a) The appelleeinthiscase,whowas the plaintiff in the courtbe-low, instituted his suit in the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, against one Pierre Oassies, and obtained a judgment, against him in the due course of law, for the sum of 3100-dollars, with interest at the rate of five per cent, from the 1st of December 1829, until paid, and costs…
Read the full summary
IN error to the. district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, (a) The appelleeinthiscase,whowas the plaintiff in the courtbe-low, instituted his suit in the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, against one Pierre Oassies, and obtained a judgment, against him in the due course of law, for the sum of 3100-dollars, with interest at the rate of five per cent, from the 1st of December 1829, until paid, and costs of suit; from which judgment an appeal was taken to this court by said Pierre Gassies, who gave, as security to the…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Story
This is a writ of error to the district court Of the eastern district ofLouisian a. The plaintiff in error was surety in an appeal bond given upon a writ of error to a.judgment of the district court of Louisiana, rendered in 1830, in the suit of Jean Gassies ‘Ballon v. Pierre Gassies ¡’which judgment was affirmed in the supreme court of the United States in 1832. Upon the cause coming back to the district court, upon the mandate of the supreme court, execution issued against the judgment debtor, Pierre Gassies, and was returned satisfied in part. Upon motion afterwards made, and due notice to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Sebastian Hiriart, in Error v. Jean Gassies BallonSupreme Court of the United States · 1835