Sullivan v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Orange county. There is a sufficient statement of the facts in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yan Yalkenbubgh
the court.
These defendants were tried upon an indictment found, for fraudulently altering the marks of an. animal, under Section 54, Chapter 4, of “ An act to provide for the punishment of crime and proceedings in criminal cases,” approved August 6th, 1868.
The first error assigned by the plaintiffs in error is, that there was no arraignment by the court of these defendants-before trial as contemplated by the law. The record presented to this court upon this point is as follows:
“Now on this day comes Alexander St. Clair Abrams,, who prosecutes the pleas of the State of Florida in this behalf,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harbaugh v. City of MonmouthIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blount v. FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Bassett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
- Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Kurtz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.