Legal Opinion

Burkholder v. Burkholder

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Kearney county. Tried below before Gaslin, J. cited: Busch v. Hagenrick, 10 Neb., 415. Clarke v. O. & S. W. IL B., 5 Neb., 319. Cook v. Smith, 54 Iowa, 637. Sherman v. Kismiller, 17 S. & R. (Penn.), 45. Graham v. Graham's Exrs., 10 Casey (Penn.), 475. Wood Master and Servant, page 126.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover for work and labor.

The plaintiff in error (defendant below), in his answer, alleges the facts to be that he, the said defendant,- with his family, moved to the state of Nebraska during the springtime of the year 1879; that at the said time the said plaintiff was residing with his guardian, in the state of Iowa; that the said plaintiff at said time ran away from his said home, and followed a brother of defendant to this state; that the plaintiff, being a brother of defendant, he, the defendant,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lynn v. SebyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Riverside Coal Co. v. HolmesNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Carlos v. Hastings Independent Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API