Legal Opinion

City of Oneonta v. Sawyer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 1943No. 6 Div. 102PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The City of Oneonta filed a bill for the reformation of a deed executed by the City to appellee, R. L. Sawyer. The trial court, on submission for final decree on pleadings and proof, denied relief and dismissed the bill.

Code of 1940, Title 47, § 136, reads: “When, through fraud, or a mutual mistake of the parties, or a mistake of one party, which the other at the time knew or suspected, a deed, mortgage, or other conveyance does not truly express the intention of the parties, it may be revised by a court of equity on the application of the party aggrieved so as to express…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Larkins v. BiddleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  2. Hemphill v. MoodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. West End Sav. Bank v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Parra v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Moore v. TateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beasley v. Mellon Financial Services Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Clipper v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Floyd v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. PhiferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Fidelity Service Insurance v. A. B. Legg & Sons Burial InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API