Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.
Plaintiff sues Rogers, Caldwell & Co., Inc., and four additional defendants for commissions earned. The complaint has been dismissed in advance of trial upon defendants’ motion. The answer alleges as a separate affirmative defense that the services rendered were those of a real estate broker as defined in section 440 of the Real Property Law, and that no recovery may be had because plaintiff was not a licensed broker. The reply to this defense admits that plaintiff was not a licensed real estate broker but denies that the services performed were those of a broker. Respondents’ position is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Stout v. William Kennelly, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by16 opinions
- Baird v. KrancerNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- Dodge v. RichmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Reiter v. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Kuffler v. ListDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Rogers v. EllsworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.