Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Prater v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2021No. 19AP-555Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Prater v. Indus. Comm.,

2021-Ohio-1890.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Lori R. Prater, : Relator, : v. : No. 19AP-555 Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Respondents. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on June 3, 2021 Philip J. Fulton Law Office, and Michael P. Dusseau, for relator. Dave Yost, Attorney General, and Anna Isupova, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio. IN MANDAMUS MENTEL, J. {¶ 1} Relator, Lori R. Prater, brought this original action seeking a writ of mandamus ordering respondent, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Lawson v. ForgeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. DeMint v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API