Legal Opinion
Citizens State Bank v. Security Bank
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1929No. File No. 6567PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurch, P. J.
This action is brought by the Citizens’ State Bank of Armour to recover upon a certificate of deposit alleged to have been issued by the Security Bank of Tyndall. The Security Bank is insolvent and in the hands of the superintendent of banks for liquidation, and the superintendent of banks, F. R. Smith, is therefore a party defendant with the defendant bank. All facts were stipulated and found by the court as stipulated.
Both banks are corporations. On December i, 1924, and at all times thereafter material to the issues involved, Geo. E. Pfeifle was the cashier and managing officer of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Friedlander v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- N.Y. N.H.R.R. Co. v. . SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Griswold v. . HavenNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Western Maryland Railroad v. Franklin BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Engen v. Merchants & Manufacturers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Northcraft v. Edward C. Michener Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Schelske v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Bank of Avon v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Menno State Bank v. Security BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929