Legal Opinion

Putnam Foundry & Machine Co. v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 23, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Westchester county court. Action by the Putnam Foundry & Machine Company against Percy B. Young. From a judgment of the county court reversing a justice’s judgment in favor of defendant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWillard Bartlett, J.

The plaintiff in this action sought to recover a balance of $55, alleged to be due under a contract whereby the plaintiff corporation undertook to furnish to the defendant and install in his house a hot-water heater, for the sum of $260 in all. The defendant pleaded a failure to perform the contract, and also set up a counterclaim of $25.75 for services rendered to the plaintiff in procuring for it another contract from one W. H. Brodt. The principal matter litigated upon the trial was the omission of the plaintiff to furnish an automatic regulator for the heating apparatus. There was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burnham v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. City of Brooklyn v. Brooklyn City & Newtown RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. City of Brooklyn v. Brooklyn City & Newtown RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guando v. AlpenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API