Legal Opinion

Bowshier v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1990No. 89-783PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The commissioner argues that R.C. 5739.16 bars only assessments made against vendors or consumers and not those against corporate officers assessed personally under R.C. 5739.33. Bowshier responds that, since a corporate officer stands charged in place of the corporate vendor, R.C. 5739.16 also applies to the corporate officer’s derivative assessment. We hold that R.C. 5739.16 does not time bar R.C. 5739.33 assessments against corporate officers.

R.C. 5739.33, during the audit period, provided:

“If any corporation required to file returns and to remit tax due to the state under the provisions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rowland v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ceccarelli v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Kroeger, 2006-L-175 (6-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API