Arkansas State Highway Comm'n v. Diper
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I agree with the court’s holding on the cross-examination of appellant’s expert witnesses preceding any testimony except the statement of qualifications and that each such witness had an opinion on the matter of value.
I cannot agree, however, on the treatment of the testimony of the value witnesses. In part, that disagreement is based upon a different concept as to evidence of market value. The difference in my concept and that of the majority is best illustrated by the inapplicability of the authority upon which its reliance is placed to the situation at hand. We do not have a case in which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. SargentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. WitkowskiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Arkansas Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- City of Woburn v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911