Legal Opinion

BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Brahos (In re Brahos)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 7, 2018No. 16 B 2160; No. 16 A 358PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

What follows are the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Rule 52(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a)(1) (made applicable by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7052 ). For the reasons discussed below, judgment will be entered in favor of BMO and against Brahos on both of the bank's claims. Brahos's discharge will be denied.

1. Jurisdiction

The court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and the district court's Internal Operating Procedure 15(a). This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J). The court may therefore enter a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Retz v. Samson (In Re Retz)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. In the Matter of Malen A. Juzwiak, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. In the Matter of Kenneth W. Smith, Debtor. Appeal of State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles V. Cook, Sr.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Meyer v. GradyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Putianshi Lichengqu Zengchangpai E-commerce Co., Ltd. v. Shuangfeng County Shuangwei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API