Legal Opinion

In re Brueckner

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 26, 1980No. Appeal No. 80-530Published

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Appeals (“board”) affirming the examiner’s rejection of appellant’s claims1 under section 151 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 2181), on the ground that the claims are to an invention useful solely in the utilization of atomic energy in an atomic weapon. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

Appellant’s invention relates to a fuel pellet configuration used in controlled nuclear fusion systems; also, to a method of increasing the efficiency of a fusion burn of the fuel. Claims 1 and 2 are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. Harold Lawrence BlasiusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. Piper v. Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API