Legal Opinion

Coker v. Mott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1916No. 5743PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

Appellant sued W. C. Mott on a promissory note for $194.40 and to foreclose a mortgage on a certain automobile, executed by Mott to appellant. W. E. Wo-mack was made a party to the suit on the ground that he was in possession of the automobile and claiming the same. The cause was tried without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of appellant as against Mott for the amount of the note, but in Jiavor of W. E. Womack for the automobile.

Womack swore that he was the owner of the Star Theater, and that on March 27, 1913, Mott, as his agent, sold the same to Tyler & Co., taking the automobile in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mann v. Wallis, Landes & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  2. Prescott v. LinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  3. Tinsley v. PennimanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Ry. Express Co. v. VoelkelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. MangCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API