Legal Opinion

Guarisco v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 20, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The actions are by an assignee of an assured on a policy covering loss of a payroll by robbery. The facts are not in dispute. The money constituting a payroll was stolen at point of firearms, when plaintiff assignor’s auto had arrived at its garage upon return trip from a bank. Such money was contained in two envelopes, both of which were concededly upon and' taken from the person of one Frank Scoparano, who upon such trip was accompanied by one Bose Stillman, a bookkeeper for the assignor’s firm. The policy as originally issued might have covered this loss, but it was later changed in effect…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BuechnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Allen v. German American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Abrams v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Aldrich v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steckler v. StecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wilkinson v. Providence Washington Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. American Indemnity Co. v. SwartzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  4. Guarisco v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. American Indemnity Company v. Anna SwartzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API