Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1957No. 29681PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment quashing an execution and denying defendant-appellant’s motion for attorney’s fee in contesting the motion to • quash the execution. The sustaining of the motion to quash the execution is a final judgment for purposes of appeal, Flynn v. Janssen, Mo.Sup., 266 S.W.2d 666, loc. cit. 671; McDougal v. McDougal, Mo.App., 279 S.W.2d 731, loc. cit. 735, as is the judgment denying the attorney’s fee, Smith v. Smith, 164 Mo.App. 439, 144 S.W. 1199, adopting, 151 Mo.App. 649, 132 S.W. 312.

The judgment appealed from grew out of these facts: On June 17,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wait v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. McDougal v. McDougalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Curtis v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Noll v. NollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Davis v. McCannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rutlader v. RutladerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Barber v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hogsett v. HogsettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Anderson v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Carlson v. AubuchonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API