United States v. Tubbs
District Court, D. South Dakota
On Motion in Arrest of Judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
OAKLAND, District Judge.
On tlie 24th day of April, 1899, the defendant was convicted upon an indictment containing eight count». The jury returned a verdict of not guilty as to the third count, upon direction of the court, and a verdict of guilty as to each of the other counts. On the 23d day of May, 1899, the date fixed for passing sentence upon said conviction, the defendant’s counsel moved the court to arrest judgment on counts 1, 6, 7, and 8, for the reason that neither of said counts state facts sufficient to constitute an offense under any law of the United States. The motion in arrest…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wright v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Winters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Wong Sun v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Pueblo v. PachecoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924
- People v. PachecoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924