Graham v. Heidrick
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 167, Oct. T., 1902, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Armstrong Co., June T., 1901, No. 165, on bill in equity in case of Elizabeth Graham v. Henry A. Heidrick, Guardian of Adam Boltz. Bill in equity for partition. Before Miller, P. J., specially presiding. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 167, Oct. T., 1902, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Armstrong Co., June T., 1901, No. 165, on bill in equity in case of Elizabeth Graham v. Henry A. Heidrick, Guardian of Adam Boltz. Bill in equity for partition. Before Miller, P. J., specially presiding. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court entered the following decree: And now, July 14, 1902, it appearing to the court that service of the bill in the above entitled case was duly made upon the defendant, Henry A. Heidrick, guardian of the minor children of Adam Boltz, and that he appeared by counsel…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Dean,
Patrick Graham owned a small farm whereon he lived and *240which he cultivated in Sugar Creek township, Armstrong county. His family consisted of a wife, Hannah, two daughters, Mary and Elizabeth, and two sons, William and Leander. He possessed, practically, no estate except the farm. This he disposed of by will as follows:
“ I leave and bequeath the farm whereon I now reside to my two sons William Graham and Leander Graham to be divided equal betwixt them share and share alike. I leave and bequeath to my daughter Mary, intermarried to John Coyle, one hundred dollars. I…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re Estate of NiesenHamilton County Probate Court · 1951
- Gerwell v. Blockus, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1972
- Sanders Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County1979
- Spencer EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Chester County · 1962