Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Pulaski County Board of Equalization
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
It appears that the Pulaski County Equalization Board, or at least the Pulaski County taxpayers, along with taxpayers in some other counties, have a legitimate complaint about the disparity in assessed valuations over the state. If assessed value was the basis only for county taxes, perhaps the matter could be viewed in a different light, but that is not entirely the case. But there can be no question about the constitutional mandate to the General Assembly to prescribe a manner of determining values for taxation that would make them uniform throughout the state and such that no one species…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Shibley v. Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Thaw v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. WorthenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- Wells, Fargo & Company's Express v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.