Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Pulaski County Board of Equalization

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1979No. 79-25Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

It appears that the Pulaski County Equalization Board, or at least the Pulaski County taxpayers, along with taxpayers in some other counties, have a legitimate complaint about the disparity in assessed valuations over the state. If assessed value was the basis only for county taxes, perhaps the matter could be viewed in a different light, but that is not entirely the case. But there can be no question about the constitutional mandate to the General Assembly to prescribe a manner of determining values for taxation that would make them uniform throughout the state and such that no one species…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Shibley v. Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Thaw v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  4. Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. WorthenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  5. Wells, Fargo & Company's Express v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API