Legal Opinion

Hall v. Kynerd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1936No. 3426PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

It is first insisted the judgment should be reversed because upon this appeal appellant has been deprived of a statement of facts thr.ough the failure of the official court reporter to attend the hearing of August 5th, and take notes of the testimony offered as required by article 2324, R.S. The record shows no effort upon appellant’s part to obtain a statement of facts independent of the reporter’s notes or one made by the judge as is authorized by articles 2242, 2243, '2240, and 2280. In this condition of the record this matter presents no reversible error.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dallas Storage & Warehouse Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Independent Life Insurance Co. of America v. WorkTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Spivey v. Saner-Ragley Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Thomas v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Peters v. Hubb Diggs Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whatley v. WhatleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Johnson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Koonce v. City of MesquiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Brady v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Croan v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API