Legal Opinion
Zak v. Robertson
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 17, 2003No. 3:01-cv-00165PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 22]
HALL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Daniel Zak and Warren Huertas (collectively “plaintiffs”), bring this action against the City of Hartford and Darlene Robertson, Manfred Rehm, Joseph Zibbideo, and Abraham Ford, in their official and individual capacities, (collectively “defendants”), alleging constitutional and state law violations arising out of the issuance of arrest warrants against them in connection with alleged housing code violations. Plaintiffs allege that, through falsification of arrest warrant affidavits and use of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burg v. GosselinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Manbeck v. MickaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Boyd v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Li v. PeckDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Pal v. CipollaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.