Legal Opinion

State v. Hawks

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1931No. 40810PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

The first complaint made by the defendant in this case is an assault on the sufficiency of the indictment.

This question is first raised in a motion to direct a verdict. It can not receive consideration because it came too late. Section 13791, Code, 1927, provides:

“All objections to the indictment relating to matters of substance and form which might be raised by demurrer shall be deemed waived if not so raised by the defendant before the jury is sworn on the trial of the case.”

Having failed to demur to the indictment, the sufficiency thereof can not be raised in a motion to direct a verdict.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MillmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. State v. WestcottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. State v. OstbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Olander v. HollowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McKillopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Hawk v. HollowellDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API