Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hubert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 24, 1986No. 85-1374Published

1ConcurrenceSharp, Judge

I agree the sentence in this case should be quashed and the cause remanded for resentencing, and the imposition of costs stricken. The reasons given by the court for the departure sentence in this case *617might, in my view, be sufficient to sustain a sentence beyond the presumptive sentence range of the guidelines1 were they adequately supported by the record.

We have held that excessive use of force and victim injury and trauma may justify imposition of a departure sentence, Lerma v. State, 476 So.2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). This is not simply a double counting of the necessary elements of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mincey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Mullen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Lerma v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Ryder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API