Legal Opinion

Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 13, 1931No. 6101PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

In 1925 the'Piedmont Savings Company sustained a statutory net loss of $43,478.25; in 1926 it sustained a further statutory net loss of $410.82; it was in those years unaffiliated. . In 1927, appellant and the Piedmont Savings Company having become affiliated, a consolidated return for that year was filed. This return disclosed a combined net income for that year of $37,128.83 made up. of appellant’s net taxable, income of $37,-582.63 and a loss of Piedmont, $453.80. The Commissioner, because Piedmont had no net income in 1927, refused to allow appellant to deduct…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. Ice Service Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. St. Louis Architectural Iron Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Busch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  5. First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Planters' Cotton Oil Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  2. Olivier Company v. PattersonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API