Legal Opinion

Shirk v. Coyle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1891No. 87PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

John L. Farrar, Josiah Farrar and Stephen D. Carpenter filed a complaint in the Miami Circuit Court in March, 1880, against Elbert H. Shirk, to recover from him a balance alleged to be due from him to one John Coyle, and assigned by Coyle to the plaintiffs. Subsequently the claim in suit was re-assigned to Coyle, and by agreement of parties Coyle was substituted as plaintiff in the case in February, 1881.

The cause was tried at the December term, 1883, of the Miami Circuit Court, and a special verdict was returned by the jury, and upon the defendant’s motion the verdict was set aside and a new…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. VoightIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Lagow v. NeilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Patterson v. ChurchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hawthorn v. State ex rel. HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. MutchlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fort Wayne Iron & Steel Co. v. ParsellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BergschickerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wolfe v. WilseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. FearnaughtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API