Legal Opinion

Saveriano v. Saracco

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 29, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

97 N.J. Super. 43 (1967)

234 A.2d 244

CONCETTA SAVERIANO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

PHILOMENA SARACCO AND SEBASTIAN SARACCO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 25, 1967.

Decided September 29, 1967.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and CARTON.

Mr. Dominic Cavaliere argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. David B. Perley argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Defendants appeal from a county district court judgment for possession, as well as from the order for warrant for possession, in a summary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. ZinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  2. Seidel v. CahajlaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Academy Spires, Inc. v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Stanger v. RidgewayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Olympic Indus. Park v. PL, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  4. Azar v. JabraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. Ivy Hill Park Section Five, Inc. v. HandaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API