Legal Opinion

Lennon v. Lennon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 24, 1986PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*789Although Special Term correctly recognized that the parties and the court were entitled to "a liberal and broad discovery process”, it erred in limiting the discovery sought by the wife up "to the year 1980”, i.e., when the instant actions for divorce were commenced. As this court stated in Lee v Lee (93 AD2d 221, 226): "The parties not only disagree over the commencement period for disclosure, but also argue over its termination point, with the plaintiff contending that she can inquire concerning the value of the defendant’s assets right up to the time of deposition, while he contends that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kaye v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Lee v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Marcus v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Anglin v. AnglinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Stempler v. StemplerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Culnan v. CulnanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API