Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank H. Roche
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 27, 2003No. 01-1634PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
The defendant-appellant, Frank H. Roche (“Roche”), has challenged his sentence entered pursuant to his plea of guilty for obstructing the administration of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1503(a), when he submitted, false documents to the court for his underlying bank robbery conviction, causing an unwarranted downward departure to his imposed incarceration. Roche has also contested the district court’s application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 3C1.1, enhancing his sentence, as a consequence of appellant’s efforts to influence witness…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ricardo Arredondo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Marc Milton LeachmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. David Harper (99-6485) and Juan Garcia (99-6543)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. AragonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Federico GiovanelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Donald W. GallimoreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. David L. MayleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Paul SolofaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- United States v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.