Legal Opinion

Exeter Realty Corp. v. Buck

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 29, 1962No. 5032PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The application of the general and familiar rule that equitable remedies will not be granted where there is an adequate remedy at law necessarily depends upon the factual circumstances in each case. Hoban v. Bucklin, 88 N. H. 73; Hatch v. Hillsgrove, 83 N. H. 91. The issue presented in this appeal is stated by the plaintiff in the following language: “Is the plaintiff without right, as a matter of law, to enjoin the defendants’ use of firearms to obstruct the plaintiff’s lawful reoccupation of its premises subsequent to the determination of the lease for breach of a covenant to pay rent?” The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Glickman v. KastelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Appeal of Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. American Board of Trade, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. City of Keene v. James Cleaveland & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  5. Milne v. Burlington Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API