Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Renzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 4, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 4, 2000, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant’s request for a hearing was untimely.

By initial determination dated and mailed June 4, 1999, claimant was informed that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause and was charged a recoverable overpayment of $652. Claimant admitted receiving the determination shortly after it was mailed but did not request a hearing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of McGeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of KraftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of McKinleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API