Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Hanes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 1952No. 4-9811PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

Appellee as plaintiff sought to recover possession of a house and lot in the City of Fort Smith; and from a decree allowing such recovery, the appellants prosecute this appeal. When appellee, E. O. Hanes, and Mrs. Ludie Frazier Hanes were married in 1907,. Mrs. Hanes had three children by a former marriage; and these children are the present appellants.

In 1918 James Grier contracted to sell the property here involved (and called the “home”) to E. O. Hanes for $1,750, of which amount $750 was paid in cash, and the balance was to be paid in monthly installments. As to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kerby v. FieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Tolley v. TolleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Smith v. MaberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Bloom v. StraussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brun v. RembertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Acord v. AcordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Perry v. RyeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Harrison v. CruseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Pierce v. LoweSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API