Legal Opinion
Dym v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 30, 1998No. 97CV1267 JM (AJB)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Dr. Jack Dym, has sued his disability insurance carrier, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Provident”), alleging insurance bad faith as well as claims for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Provident has filed a counterclaim in which it seeks a declaration that plaintiff is not entitled to total disability benefits because he is not totally disabled under the terms of his policies. Provident has filed a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Provident’s motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Tomaselli v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lana Guebara, Cross-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Douglas McOsker v. Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- John A. Dowdle, Jr., M.D. v. National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Yahiro v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Gross v. Unumprovident Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.