Legal Opinion
Las Tunas Beach Geologic Hazard Abatement District v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 1995No. B090779PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Petitioners Las Tunas Beach Geologic Hazard Abatement District and the board of directors thereof (the District) seek a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order denying the District’s motion for summary judgment and to enter instead an order granting the motion.
The essential issue is whether real party in interest City of Malibu (the City) was entitled in the resolution forming the District to reserve the right to dissolve the District, and whether the City thereafter could order dissolution of the District pursuant to that condition of formation.
Because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Pacific Scene, Inc. v. Penasquitos, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Franklin v. AppelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Mir v. Charter Suburban HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Los Angeles Export Terminal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Cordova v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Denny's, Inc. v. City of Agoura HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Prime Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Valley Health System (In Re Valley Health System)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.