Legal Opinion

Benefit Association of Railway Employees v. Dahn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1954No. 3208PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Justice.

Appellee, Mrs. Opal Dahn, sued appellant for benefits alleged to be due her under a policy of insurance on account of the death of her husband. The policy excluded indemnity for loss caused by suicide. Appellant denied liability on the ground that appellee’s husband had committed suicide by shooting himself. Upon the conclusion of the evidence the court submitted the case to the jury on the following special issue: “Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Eldon G. Dahn, on or about December 6, 1952, on the occasion in question, shot himself intentionally?” The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. A. B. C. Storage & Moving Co. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. McGowen v. McGowenTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Pilkinton v. Gulf Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Southern Surety Co. v. WeaverTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Roosth & Genecov Production Company v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Gulf Casualty Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. GoforthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Harris v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API