Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Huff

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the circuit court of Pike county. Hon. W. H. "Wilkinson, Judge. - Beplevin by B'. H. Huff against D. F. Vaughn et al. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the circuit court of Pike county. Hon. W. H. "Wilkinson, Judge. - Beplevin by B'. H. Huff against D. F. Vaughn et al. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Notwithstanding the fact that all the evidence in the case shows that H. F. Vaughn did not in fact execute the forthcoming bond, and notwithstanding the fact that W. B. Vaughn, trustee, did execute the bond, and notwithstanding the fact that the evidence plainly shows that D. F. Vaughn did not have the possession, but that the property was actually in the possession…

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

This is an action of replevin by 'the appellee, K-. H. Huff, against the appellant, D. P. Vaughn, and his son, W. B. Vaughn, which was dismissed by the court below as to the latter. ’ A judgment was rendered in favor of appellee against the appellant for thé possession of the property involved, from which appellant prosecutes this appeal.

The appellee, for the purpose of securing an indebtedness due by him to the appellant, executed a deed of trust on the property involved to W. B. Vaughn, as trus*112tee. At the instance of the appellant, the trustee took possession of the property for the purpose…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Furst v. PeaseMississippi Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frierson v. Mississippi Road Supply Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ainsworth v. BlakeneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ainsworth v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API