Hadock Bros. v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Hunt. Tried below before Hon. ¡E. W. Terhune, The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Associate Justice.
J. M. Ragsdale, owning five hundred dollars in an adjusted fire insurance policy, was insolvent, as was well known to Hill, the appellee.
Ragsdale sold his interest in the insurance policy to Hill for five hundred dollars, and Hill executed to him in payment his negotiable promissory note for that sum.
Appellants were creditors of Ragsdale for a large sum of money, and sued out against Hill a writ of garnishment.
Hill answered, denying being indebted to Ragsdale or having effects of his in his possession.
Appellants contested the answer.
The issues tendered by plaintiffs…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Williams Chastain v. LairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Essex v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- First National Bank v. FrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Ford v. HonseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Edwards v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.